A Practical Guide for Innovation and Impact
Katya Linossi, Co-Founder and CEO
More blogs by this author
Katya Linossi, Co-Founder and CEO
More blogs by this authorIn law firms and professional services organizations, knowledge is not a side asset...it is the business.
The expertise captured in precedents, playbooks, advice, matter experience, and specialist insight is what differentiates one firm from another. You could argue whether the question is about “Who owns knowledge in a firm?” or “What happens to the firm if no one owns knowledge?”
Knowledge that is not owned becomes:
Knowledge ownership refers to the authority, responsibility, and accountability for creating, maintaining, using, and sharing knowledge assets within an organization.
In practice, when firms ask “who owns knowledge?”, they are really asking:
Who is responsible for keeping knowledge current?
Who decides what is trusted and reusable?
Who ensures knowledge survives beyond individuals?
Who governs knowledge as the firm adopts AI?
The short answer is:
Knowledge is a collective asset of the firm, built on shared contribution from everyone, but it must also have clear operational ownership.
Enterprise knowledge is a shared organizational asset that depends on contributions from individuals, teams, and leadership. While the organization legally owns most formal knowledge assets, value is created only when knowledge is actively shared, contextualized, and reused.
High-performing professional services organizations recognize that knowledge requires both shared contribution (everyone participates) and clear accountability (someone is responsible).
This is the essence of the knowledge owner model and the role is accountable for ensuring a knowledge asset remains accurate, governed, accessible, trusted and reusable.
Effective knowledge ownership requires clear roles and aligned accountability across the firm from the knowledge creators to the knowledge multipliers to the knowledge architects and strategic owners.
Lawyers generate knowledge constantly:
drafting clauses
negotiating positions
refining advice
learning from outcomes
Their responsibility is not only expertise, but capturing insight, sharing lessons learned and reducing reinvention. The challenge is that most lawyers are time-poor, so knowledge management (KM) must be embedded into workflow and not treated as extra admin.
Practice group heads play a pivotal role in whether knowledge scales beyond individuals.
They act as:
connectors of expertise
sponsors of consistency
drivers of reuse
Without practice leadership involvement, KM remains peripheral. With it, knowledge becomes part of how the group delivers value.
KM leaders are not librarians. They are architects of the firm’s knowledge system.
Their remit increasingly includes:
governance structures
AI readiness
trusted content models
lifecycle accountability
adoption and behaviour change
The greatest predictor of KM success remains executive commitment. Without leadership sponsorship platforms stagnate, silos dominate and adoption falls.
Executives determine whether knowledge is treated as overhead or strategic capital.
Despite good intentions, many firms struggle to share knowledge effectively. Without clear executive sponsorship, KM is often seen as optional rather than strategic, lacking the authority, investment, and visibility needed to drive firm-wide adoption. At the same time, siloed practice groups and geographically dispersed teams can trap valuable expertise within individuals or practice areas , limiting reuse and consistency across the firm.
Technology fragmentation further compounds the issue, with knowledge scattered across SharePoint sites, inboxes, document management systems, shared drives, and precedent banks, making it difficult for professionals to find trusted information quickly.
Resistance to change also plays a role, as lawyers under pressure often default to asking someone they know rather than navigating systems that feel disconnected from daily work. Ultimately, these challenges are not simply technology problems, they reflect deeper operating model issues around governance, accountability, and how knowledge is integrated into professional workflows.
In contrast, organizations that succeed with enterprise knowledge management treat knowledge as a living strategic asset rather than a static repository. They embed knowledge sharing into the way work gets done, supported by leadership, culture, and modern technology.
Successful knowledge-driven organizations consistently demonstrate:
Leadership commitment
Knowledge is recognized as critical to productivity, risk management, innovation, and client service. Leaders actively model knowledge-sharing behaviours and invest in the resources needed to sustain them.
Integrated workflows
Knowledge sharing is not treated as an additional task or separate program. Instead, it is embedded into daily operations through tools and processes that make capturing, finding, and reusing knowledge a natural part of work.
High employee engagement
Contributors feel valued, trusted, and recognized for sharing expertise. A strong knowledge culture depends on psychological safety, collaboration, and a shared sense that knowledge strengthens the entire organization.
Continuous improvement
Knowledge practices evolve over time. Successful enterprises regularly evaluate what is working, refine governance models, improve content quality, and adapt knowledge systems as business needs and technologies change.
Atlas is purpose-built to address the knowledge challenges that are uniquely acute in law firms and professional services environments, where expertise is distributed across practice groups, content is fragmented, and trust in precedent and advisory material is critical.
With Atlas, firms can:
Connect lawyers and consultants to the most credible, trusted knowledge at the point of need, ensuring that AI-driven outputs are grounded in governed, approved sources rather than outdated drafts or unmanaged repositories.
Surface subject-matter expertise across the firm, helping professionals quickly identify “who knows” as well as “what we know,” especially in complex matters that require specialist insight.
Consolidate Microsoft 365 and third-party systems into a single, unified knowledge experience, bringing together precedents, matter learnings, client guidance, and work product across SharePoint, Teams, and external platforms.
Embed governance without creating friction, by enforcing knowledge rules at the moment of creation—so professionals can contribute confidently, and firms can reduce downstream risk and inconsistency.
Prepare enterprise knowledge for Copilot and AI readiness, ensuring that the firm’s collective expertise is structured, discoverable, and usable as part of modern AI-enabled legal workflows.
By combining governance, discoverability, and a seamless Microsoft 365 experience, Atlas helps firms turn knowledge from an operational burden into a strategic advantage—supporting faster delivery, stronger consistency, and more scalable expertise.
In a law firm, knowledge is a collective organizational asset, but it requires clear operational ownership. While individuals create expertise, firms must assign accountability to ensure knowledge is governed, kept current, trusted, and reusable across the organization.
Knowledge ownership is the responsibility and accountability for creating, maintaining, governing, and sharing knowledge assets. It ensures that knowledge remains accurate, accessible, and valuable over time rather than being lost or duplicated.
Knowledge ownership is critical because professional services firms depend on consistent advice, risk management, and reusable expertise. Without clear ownership, firms experience duplicated work, lost knowledge, increased risk, and weaker AI outcomes.
Enterprise knowledge responsibility is shared across roles. Lawyers create knowledge, practice leaders ensure reuse and consistency, KM and innovation leaders design governance and systems, and firm leadership provides strategic sponsorship and cultural support.
AI tools rely on trusted, governed knowledge sources. Clear knowledge ownership ensures that AI and Copilot outputs are based on validated, current content rather than outdated or unmanaged information, reducing risk and improving confidence in AI-assisted work.
In law firms and professional services organizations, knowledge ownership is collective and accountability must be explicit. Expertise may originate with individuals, but long-term value depends on the firm’s ability to institutionalize that knowledge in ways that support quality, risk management, client outcomes, and innovation.
Firms that succeed treat knowledge as a living system: continuously created, governed, applied, and improved as part of everyday work. They invest in leadership sponsorship, clear ownership models, and platforms that make trusted knowledge easy to contribute, find, and reuse—by people and by AI. Firms that struggle tend to treat knowledge as static content, a repository problem, or a side initiative disconnected from the operating model.
As AI becomes embedded in legal and professional workflows, the question of who owns knowledge becomes inseparable from how it is governed, validated, and applied. Firms that clarify ownership, remove structural barriers, and deliberately prepare their knowledge for AI will unlock far more value from what they already know—and significantly reduce the risks of getting it wrong.
For those eager to explore further, a plethora of AI and knowledge management blogs and e-books are available, providing deeper insights and strategies tailored to various industries.
Subscribe to our newsletter
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
A Practical Guide for Innovation and Impact
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.