Did your agency build your website CMS? 6 reasons why in 2014 this isn’t a great idea!

Posted 13 November 2014 12:00 AM by Brad Smith, Commercial Director @ ClearPeople

6 reasons why in 2014 this isn’t a great idea!

I’ve noticed that a lot of businesses I talk to about their website and intranet development projects work with ‘agencies’ who deliver solutions built on a content management system that they have developed themselves. 

It got me thinking about the pros and cons of such a relationship, and also about the benefits of working with an agency that is agnostic in its approach to technology. 

It may sound a bit unusual coming from a technology agency, but here at ClearPeople we believe that technology is secondary - i.e. it’s not about the website, it’s about the experience. 

For us, a digital project begins with a deep understanding of your business and not with a ‘one size fits all’ technical solution. 

That’s why I have come up with 6 reasons why I think there is an inherent risk in working with a company that puts its own technology first. Let me know if you agree. 

1. You’re locked into a technology for a long time…

Market experience tells us most businesses expect to get between 3 and 5 years out of their investment in their chosen content management system (CMS). However due to budgetary constraints and the need to prove an ongoing ROI, many organisations actually try and push this nearer to 5 to 7 years. That’s a long time to use one technology that may or may not be keeping up to date with currents market trends and your business objectives.

2. If you fall out with the agency who built your CMS, you’re stuck with a technology nobody else understands…

I’m sure the relationship would have been sold to you with the key benefit of working with one supplier, but in reality how many technology companies have truly managed to deliver exceptional technology and a superlative delivery capability?

3. Your user requirements don’t come first, the technology does…

Proven technologies have proven implementation partners. Companies like Microsoft, IBM and Sitecore don’t have in-house delivery teams implementing their products for their customers. Why? Because technology moves at such a pace that priority needs to be given to continuous development and improvements of a product, and working to satisfy client’s requirements will get in the way. 

4. A jack of all trades is actually a master of none…

I’ve never met an agency that has won awards for producing the best design, best processes, best delivery capability and the best content management platform in the industry. There’s a reason for this.

5. You don’t want the same website as everybody else…

Customisations to the product that the client requests that don’t enhance or drive forwards the CMS platform will be ignored because it takes away from investment in the CMS itself.  If your customisations are not agreed to you’ll have to settle for the same as everybody else.

6. The solution may look nice on the surface but often is only skin-deep…

Many agencies with their own platform use proprietary or bespoke solutions, sometimes built 7 or 8 years ago, and sprucing them up so that they appear on face value to have a form of depth, but when you dig behind the scenes it’s evident that the capability of the product is very limited.

 
When talking to businesses about this I often ask them to imagine building a new home from scratch. You’ve hired a fantastic architect who has drawn up some inspirational designs. His skills lie in putting the overall vision down on paper. But you wouldn’t expect him to build the foundations and get his hands dirty with the bricks and mortar. You wouldn’t seek him out to fix your plumbing and your electrics, or glaze your windows. You would choose the right people, with the right skillsets for the job, who recommend appropriate products to complete your dream home.
 
The same can certainly be said for your digital projects. Hire an agency that has a specialised team of experts in their distinct disciplines to bring your vision to life. They will help you choose the right design and the right technology to create an exceptional user experience. 
 
Drop me a line if you'd like to talk through this approach in more detail.

Share:

Add your comment

 
 

 

Archive

Tagcloud

emplyee engagement staff satisfaction productivity Microsoft Teams Office 365 Yammer cms content management system agile GDPR Microsoft Graph collaboration Microsoft sharepoint 2016 upgrade migration SharePoint Online 2016 Tech Trends Digital Disruption Context marketing marketing SharePoint 2010 SharePoint 2013 TFS Git security kentico Analytics intranet jquery QA Quality Assurance testing digital workspace content management websites Sitecore sitecore marketplace sitecore module cloud Microsoft Cloud Storage digital strategy technical consulting sitecore modules Experience database Sitecore 7 Sitecore 8 support account management customer experience Data Storage windows azure cms integration front end front end development prototype Cloud Storage StorSimple Front-end Development Layout SharePoint 2013 colour palette UI design website design log viewer sitecore cms website Azure big data business-critical sharepoint accessibility android apple chrome clear people clearpeople debug emulator ios mobile testing opera resize adobe desktop flash ie10 internet explorer 10 metro windows 8 bcsp SharePoint Advanced System Reporter reporting framework ControlMode form control master page placeholder publishing console SharePoint 2007 SharePoint error search search results search values software testing testing scenario audit content information architecture retention schedules PowerShell QuickLaunch scripts SharePoint server 2010 business solutions metalogix replication replicator storagepoint stena technet UK Technet picture library slideshow web part RTM released to manufacturing caml caml query MOSS 2007 query infopath